Flip-top table for protection from projectiles

ABSTRACT

A flip-top table has a tabletop attached to a frame through a pivoting assembly. The tabletop is made from a ballistic-resistant material allowing it to be used as a ballistic shield when it rotates from its horizontal working position to a vertical shielding position. A front modesty panel is also ballistic-resistant and is mounted between the front legs of the frame. A lift speed restrictor is connected between the tabletop and the frame which prevents the user from lifting the tabletop too quickly which could topple the table, and it includes a biasing mechanism that provides a lifting force and helps to hold the tabletop in the shielding position. The table also includes visual indicators that readily indicate to persons around the table that the table can be converted into a ballistic shield. Casters allow one or more tables to be quickly moved and repositioned into a defensive arrangement.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 16/412,697 filed on May 15, 2019 which is acontinuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/201,099filed on Nov. 27, 2018 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,295,311 on May 21,2019 and which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationNo. 62/675,091 filed May 22, 2018, all of which are incorporated byreference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

Not Applicable.

APPENDIX

Not Applicable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to armored furniture that offersprotection from ballistic projectiles, and more particularly to flip-toptables having a table-top and modesty panel formed from ballisticmaterials and operating as a protective shield.

Related Art

Ballistic shields have long been used for protecting individuals facedwith a threat by stopping projectiles. It is generally known to thosehaving an ordinary skill in the art that ballistic shields may beintegrated into pieces of furniture which thereby serve multiple uses.Particularly, the pieces of furniture, such as a table, can function asa traditional furniture piece until such a time as when a threat ispresent and the furniture is then used as a ballistic shield.

Most prior art devices incorporate ballistic resistant material into thestandard portions of the furniture. For example, a table that isintended to function as a ballistic shield when a threat is present mayhave a tabletop surface made from a ballistic resistant material.Additionally, tables having a front and side modesty screen may also usea ballistic resistant material which a person may duck behind when ashooting threat is present. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 8,701,544describes a desk having desk panels, such as the desktop surface andfront modesty screen, made from a ballistic resistant material.Similarly, a book shelf may have a backside made from a ballisticresistant such described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,528,797.

Other known devices not only incorporate ballistic resistant materialinto the furniture sections but also combine removable and rotatingportions wherein the furniture converts from the traditional furnituredesign to a ballistic shield design. For example U.S. Pat. No. 6,170,379describes a desk having a removable desktop surface which is intended tobe used as a shield when a threat is present. Additionally, US Pat. App.No. 2015/0033990 and US Pat. App. No. 2015/0153143 describe desks thatconvert into ballistic shields where the desktops rotate into a verticalposition and abut a modesty screen attached to the legs of the table andform a single shield.

However, these known devices fail to account for the additional weightof ballistic materials as compared with standard furniture materials orthe adrenaline of individuals in high stress threat situations, suchwith an active shooter threat, which cause individuals to act quicklyand with excess force. The '379 Patent presents a particular problem asthe removable ballistic shield will generally be heavier than what manypeople can wield. For example, a 2′×3′ tabletop surface made fromballistic materials could be almost one hundred (100) pounds which wouldnot be easily wielded by most individuals, especially elementary schoolstudents. Conversely, if the thickness of the panel is reduced to reducethe weight of the shield, it is less resistant to higher caliberprojectiles and can be ineffective in many situations.

Known devices that offer pivoting surfaces, such as the '990 applicationand the '143 application, also fail to accommodate for the increasedweight of traditional ballistic material and increased adrenalinepresent in threatening situations. In particular, these referencesdescribe tabletops with pivoting surfaces but do not address the factthat the added weight of the ballistic material and the speed with whichthe surface will be lifted will likely cause the entire unit to toppleover as they are thrown from the table position to the shieldingposition. In operation, the user will likely being raising the desktopinto the shielding position as quickly as possible considering thepresent threat. As the topside of the desk or table is flipped forwardthe center of gravity necessarily moves forward and momentum may causethe unit to topple if the momentum is too great which would leave theperson(s) vulnerable to the threat without the protection of theshielding surfaces. Additionally, many ballistic materials are heavierthan many standard tabletop surfaces used in flip-top tables, and someindividuals may find it difficult to lift the tabletop.

These references do not teach or suggest any mechanism to control thelift speed to ensure that the shield does not topple over when a threatis present. Additionally, these references do not have anycounterbalance holding the table in the upright position when thedesktop is thrown forward into the shielding position. Accordingly, theymay lift the desktop with as much force as possible which will tend tobe greater than their average force considering the excess adrenaline.Unfortunately, this excess force will likely cause the entire unit totopple forward and render the shield useless. Accordingly, there is aneed for a controlled lift of a tabletop that preferably also providessome lift assistance. It would also be beneficial to have a device thatbiases or locks the tabletop in the shielding position once it is movedto this position to prevent the tabletop from being knocked back down byprojectiles hitting the tabletop surface.

Although the table disclosed in the '990 application has longitudinalbase supports extending forward of the shield which may require agreater force to topple the unit forward when the tabletop is moved toits vertical position, base supports alone are not sufficient to preventthe table from toppling forward if a person exerts enough force duringthe lift, which is likely in a high stress threat situation. Theballistic shield apparatus disclosed in the '143 application is designedfor attachment to a current desk; it includes a torsion spring that canhelp with lifting the desktop shield (a gas spring is also suggested)but does not suggest supports forward of the shield and thus the entireunit would likely topple over unless the surface is slowly lifted, whichis unlikely to occur when a threat is present. If the ballistic shieldapparatus is added to a table that has longitudinal base supports belowthe legs and which extend forward of the shield, the front shield wouldnot extend below the base supports which would result in a large open,unprotected section at the bottom of the table, and since the frontshield of the ballistic shield apparatus is connected to a spacer shieldthat is attached to the mounting bracket at the topside of the desk, itdoes not attach to and extend between the legs of the table.Additionally, neither of these references discloses or suggests a lowercrossbeam for additional rigidity at the bottom end of the legs.

Another reference that may adequately account for the increased weightand adrenaline associated with the lifting action when a threat ispresent can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 9,615,658. This reference describesa pivoting desktop which rotates into a shielding position but which isconnected to a chair portion. Accordingly, when the desktop is liftedinto the shielding position, it is less likely topple forward where thechair and seated person act as a counter balance and hold the shieldingtable upright. However, the addition of the chair limits mobility of thetable and does not easily lend itself to being moved into strategicpositions. Additionally, the chair prevents multiple units from nestingwithin one another, for example when the units are being shipped andstored.

There remains an issue in these known ballistic table devices becausenone of them adequately account for the additional weight oftraditionally available ballistic resistant material nor the excessforce that will be used by individuals in threatening situations alongwith the ability to quickly move and reposition the tables, even frombehind the tabletop when it is in the vertical position with a threat onthe opposite side. It would also be beneficial for ballistic tables tobe readily identifiable as offering additional protection so that theycan be differentiated from ordinary flip-top tables that do not offerballistic protection. Additionally, while some of the ballistic tablesin the prior art are small enough to be lifted to move, such as in the'379 Patent, the '658 Patent, the '143 application, and the '990application, many ballistic tables and other items of furniture areeither fixed to the floor or too heavy to be lifted, such as in the '254Patent, the '544 Patent, and the '797 Patent, and as indicated in the'254 Patent and '797 Patent, casters are beneficial to more easily movelarger items of furniture into a position to maximize their protectiveeffects. For ballistic flip-top tables in particular, the small,liftable tables without casters and the large, fixed tables typicallyprovide protection all the way to the floor, and it would be beneficialfor large, flip-top ballistic tables with casters to provide protectiondown to the floor.

Flip-top tables, or flipper tables, are made by various manufacturersand incorporate some of the same features used in a ballistic flip-toptable, such as base supports that extend in front of the legs, liftassist devices, and modesty panels. However, even if the standardtabletop and modesty panel materials are replaced withballistic-resistant materials, these tables do not include theparticular features that are critical for providing ballisticprotection. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,008,789 by Bradley, U.S. Pat.No. 5,121,697 by Baum, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,983 by Williamsondescribe flip-top tables with a tabletop that pivots from a horizontalposition for working thereon to a vertical position for access to acompartment or storage of the table. These standard flip-top tables donot include a ballistic resistant tabletop and modesty panel connectedto and extending between the legs nor do they have a lower crossbeam toprovide for additional structural support and rigidity. Further, forthose standard flip-top tables that have a modesty panel and casters,the modesty panel does not extend down below the wheel axis to the floorwhich renders the table ineffective for ballistic protection. Inoperation, the tabletop in the '789 patent pivots relative to the frontedge of the tabletop to allow access to a storage compartment of thedesk held beneath the tabletop, and the tabletops in the '697 patent andthe '983 patent pivot to a vertical position for storage of the tableswith the pivot axis being closer to the center of the tabletop than thefront edge. As with the other prior art discussed herein, withoutparticular supporting structures and counterbalances for the additionalweight of a ballistic tabletop, these references cannot operate as aballistic shield without changing their principle of operation.

Accordingly, there remains a need for an improved ballistic resistantpiece of furniture that can function as a traditional furniture pieceand also function as a ballistic shield. Particularly, the improvedpiece of furniture needs to account for the increased weight of aballistic shield so that any sized individual can effectively convert itinto the shielding position but also necessarily restrict the speed atwhich it can be converted into the shielding position so that the unitdoes not topple over. Additionally, the piece of furniture needs to bemobile so that it can be easily moved both during threatening situationsas well as in non-threat situations when the furniture simply needs tobe moved from storing, cleaning, and other ordinary uses.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention is a piece of furniture, such as but not limited to atable, desk or similar work station with a flip-top tabletop surface,that has ballistic panels that rotate in a controlled manner to serve asa shield against projectiles. In the preferred aspect of the invention,a ballistic tabletop panel is pivotally attached to the frame androtates between a traditional working position and a shielding position.Accordingly, the tabletop surface can be used as a traditional worksurface and pivoted into a shielding position. The table has a frontballistic panel modesty screen that is mounted between the front legs,and an edge of the pivoting surface overlaps the upper edge of themodesty screen when it is rotated into the shielding position. Inaddition to the pivot assembly allowing the tabletop to rotate betweenthe working position and the shielding position, a lift assist cylinderhelps a user pivot the surface into the shielding position and furtherincludes a lift speed restricting mechanism that prevents the user fromlifting the surface too quickly. Without the restricting mechanism, auser may lift the surface too quickly and the forward momentum may causethe entire unit to topple where there is no counterbalance attached tothe unit. Similarly, a lift assist is necessary where the added weightof the ballistic resistant tabletop may be too heavy for some users tolift on their own. When in the shielding position, the lift assistdoubles as a biasing mechanism to hold the tabletop in the shieldingposition and standoff posts attached to the legs prevent the tabletopfrom over-rotating and making contact with the modesty panel.

In another aspect of the present invention in the preferred embodiment,the furniture includes a specially color-coded latch mechanism, acolor-coded rear edge of the tabletop (i.e., the edgeband facing theuser in a seated position), a color-coded top edge of the modesty panel,and color-coded casters to clearly indicate to a person seated at thetable or standing around the table that the furniture is made withballistic resistant panels rather than having structural panels. Thecolor-coded rear edge is readily visible by persons seated at the tablewith the tabletop in the working position and is also readily visible bypersons standing in a room when the tabletop is flipped up into theshielding position. The casters are also readily visible when looking atthe bottom of the table. Accordingly, when several tables are in a room,with some tables having standard structural panels while other tableshave the ballistic resistant panels, the color indicators are helpful topersons in the room to quickly differentiate between the different typesof tables and identify the tables that offer increased protection fromprojectiles. Alternatively, other indicating indicia can be used incombination with our in place of the preferred color indicator. Thefurniture can be outfitted with a safety box that would also preferablybe marked with the color-coded indicator.

It is another aspect of the table of the present invention to serve thesame purposes as a standard flip-top table and for the specialmodifications described above to serve as a projectile resistant shieldin under five (5) seconds. Each table can protect multiple rows ofpeople behind the ballistic panels and can easily be integrated intoschool classrooms, office and other work environments without disruptionto the day-to-day operation of the environment.

Other aspects of the table include an expanded wheelbase, centeredmodesty panel between the wheels and the lift speed restrictor tocontrol the speed and force as the top is rotating. The lift speedrestrictor also adds additional stability to the top when it is in theupright position to keep it from folding back into the table positionwhen a projectile hits the shield. Further, custom plates that consistof a rolled rod and bearing system allow the table top to easily rotateand integrated handles minimize the kit of parts.

Further areas of applicability of the present invention will becomeapparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It shouldbe understood that the detailed description and specific examples, whileindicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended forpurposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope ofthe invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will become more fully understood from thedetailed description and the accompanying drawings, FIGS. 1-7, that areprovided on ten (10) drawing sheets.

FIGS. 1A-1B are rear and front perspective views, respectively, of theballistic shielding table in the working position according to theinvention described herein.

FIG. 2A-2B are perspective views, respectively, of the ballisticshielding table in the shielding position according to the inventiondescribed herein.

FIG. 3A-3B are rear views of the ballistic shielding table in theworking position and shielding position, respectively, according to theinvention described herein.

FIGS. 4A-4B are front views of the ballistic shielding table in theworking position and shielding position, respectively, according to theinvention described herein.

FIG. 5A is a side view of the ballistic shielding table in the workingposition with the latching locking mechanism locked according to theinvention described herein.

FIG. 5B is a detailed side view of the ballistic shielding table in theworking position with the latching locking mechanism unlocked accordingto the invention described herein

FIG. 6 is a side view of the ballistic shielding table in the shieldingposition according to the invention described herein.

FIG. 7 is a rear perspective view of the ballistic shielding tabledescribed herein having a traditional work station on the tabletopthereof.

FIGS. 8A and 8B are upward-looking and downward-looking perspectiveviews of another embodiment of the ballistic shielding table in theworking position and in the shielding position, respectively, accordingto the invention described herein.

FIGS. 9A and 9B are side views of alternative embodiments of theballistic shielding table particularly suited to protect againstshrapnel blasted from explosive devices as well as bullets fired fromguns.

FIGS. 10A and 10B are side views of additional alternative embodimentsof the ballistic shielding table particularly suited to protect againstshrapnel blasted from explosive devices as well as bullets fired fromguns.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merelyexemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention,its application, or uses.

The invention described herein is a piece of ballistic shieldingfurniture and more particularly a table 10 having a projectile resistanttabletop 16 and modesty panel 18 connected to and extending between apair of legs 28. The tabletop is designed quickly flip upwards from itsworking position 52 into a shielding position 54 by releasing a lockingmechanism 20 on the underside of the tabletop and rotating upwards tobecome a ballistic shield that may protect multiple rows or groupings ofpeople from various ballistic projectiles, such as bullets fired fromguns as well as shrapnel and other fragments blasted by an explosivedevice. The table is generally made up of a projectile resistanttabletop structure and modesty screen, a frame 12 supporting thetabletop and modesty panel, a pivot assembly 14 connecting the table topto the frame, an actuator 22 with a combined lift assist and lift speedrestrictor 22 a and casters 24 that allow the entire table to be readilymoved and repositioned either by itself or with other anti-ballistictables into a defensive arrangement.

The frame 12 is preferably made from a solid single piece steel framehaving a pair of vertical legs 28, a base 32 with a pair of longitudinalsupports 84 attached to one end of the legs and at least one crossbeam30 connected between the pair of vertical legs. The legs areperpendicular to the crossbeam, and the longitudinal supports areperpendicular to the legs and the crossbeam. Steel support plates 92preferably connect a pivot assembly 14 to an upper crossbeam laterallyextending between and connected to the proximal ends of the verticallegs 78 a, opposite from the distal ends 78 b connected to the base.Accordingly, the pair of legs are connected to one another by the uppercrossbeam which supports the tabletop and pivot assembly and have aheight 80 that may vary relative to the type, size and intended user ofthe work station. For example, a desk intended for use in an elementaryschool will have shorter legs than a desk being used in a businesssetting. However, these desks will operate in the same fashion asdescribed herein. Alternatively, the support plates are removed, andbrackets alone connect the tabletop to the pivot assembly and providesupport when the table is in the working and shielding positionsdescribed below.

Opposite from the upper crossbeam, a lower crossbeam may be connectedbetween the pair of base supports and laterally extend there between.Similarly, one or more additional cross members may span the distancebetween the vertical legs to provide additional support to the frame andmay also provide mounting positions for the modesty panel. In thepreferred embodiment, a lower crossbeam having a support tray 90 isoffset from the upper cross beam and attached to frame beneath thelongitudinal supports on the front side of the legs and upper crossbeam.In in this embodiment the lower crossbeam has a panel support tray thatsupports the modesty panel wherein the bottom edge of the panel isseated within the tray.

In an alternative frame design, the lower crossbeam may be replaced orused in addition to a truss frame, as shown by the dashed lines in FIG.3A. In this alternative embodiment, angled supports 118 can connect fromthe distal ends of the legs to the top edge of the modesty panel andadditional fasteners can be used along the truss supports to hold themodesty panel. Further, it will be appreciated by those having anordinary skill in the art that other cross members could be used.

The longitudinal supports of the base are attached to the distal ends ofthe legs and extend between a front end 120 a on the frame's front side34 a and a rear end 120 b on the frame's rear side 34 b. To adequatelysupport the tabletop and provide a sturdy base, the supports have alength 86 that is approximately equal to the height of the legs in thepreferred embodiment. However, in other embodiments with highertabletops and other types of top panels, such as a podium or a standingwork station, it will be appreciated that the supports may be shorterthan the leg height.

Each of the supports has a set of casters 24 at the feet of the supportsthat make the table very mobile and which may also be locked to hold thetable in place. Preferably, each longitudinal support has a pair ofcasters at opposite ends with one caster attached on the front side ofthe leg and the other caster on the rear side of the leg. In such anembodiment the rearward casters 24 b lock with caster locking mechanisms122 while the forward casters 24 a do not lock whereby a person does nothave to go to the front side 34 a of the ballistic shield to unlock thefront casters when a threat is present but can remain on the rear side34 b of the ballistic shield table to unlock to rearward casters to moveand reposition the table when the table is in its working position or inits shielding position. Additionally, if the tabletop is lifted upwardsinto the shielding position to quickly, the forward casters will causethe entire table to roll forward as the center of gravity moves forwardand thus further prevent toppling. The casters may also be motorized orelectronic and work in an autonomous fashion to link more than one tabletogether through a wireless system or network.

The frame 12 also has a set of handles 124 attached to the topside 94 ofthe upper crossbeam opposite from the pivot rod which allows anindividual to easily maneuver the table to always face the threat, asshown in FIG. 2A. It also allows the table to be fully mobile in alldirections and used as a mobile shield for first responders or even abattering ram as well allowing the table to be easily removed forcleaning or similar purposes. As in U.S. Pat. No. 9,010,254 which isincorporated by reference herein, when the tabletop is in the shieldingposition, the table can be used to block a doorway. The tabletop isfurther supported in the preferred embodiment with steel support platesconnected to the topside of the lateral crossbeam. When used the pivotrod of the pivot assembly is integrally formed with the front edge 92 aof the support plate. Similarly, the handles may be integrated into rearedge 92 b of the support plates rather than directly attached to thecrossbeam. To provide adequate support, the support plates extend pastthe crossbeam on both the front and rear side of the frame and have alength 76 that is at least twice the width of the tabletop.

In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, the handle is elongated andtubular in shape and is attached to the rear edge of the upper crossbeamand through several standoff connectors 138 that position the handle adistance towards the rear edge of the tabletop, i.e., spaced thestandoff connector length (L_(SC)) from the rear edge of the uppercrossbeam. Although the size and the shape of this alternative handledesign is not intended to be limiting, it is preferred that the handlelength (L_(H)) is greater than the tabletop distance (D_(T)) between itsfront edge 104 a and its rear edge 104 b and is less than the length ofthe upper crossbeam (L_(UC)), i.e., D_(T)<L_(H)<L_(UC). Additionally,opposing end sections 124 b of the handle are preferably angled furtheraway from the rear edge of the upper crossbeam toward the rear edge ofthe table in the working position to a point where the distal ends 140of the handle's end sections are positioned more than twice the distanceof the standoff connector length which provide additional clearancebetween the crossbeam and the handle's end sections and facilitateeasier movement of table itself where multiple gripping positions thatare offset from the longitudinal axis of the crossbeam are provided. Asparticularly depicted in FIGS. 8A and 8B, this alternative handle designhas a center section 124 a that is parallel to the crossbeam withopposite end sections angled away from the ends of the center sectiontowards the rear of the tabletop.

It will also be appreciated that the handle can provide the catch thatengages the locking mechanism in the working position as furtherdescribed herein. As shown and described with regard to the preferredembodiment, a catch extends from the crossbeam and the locking mechanismengages the catch to hold the tabletop in the working position. Incomparison, as shown in FIG. 8A, the locking mechanism may engage aportion 142 of the center section of the handle and thereby remain inthe working position until the locking mechanism releases the catch andthe tabletop pivots into the shielding position. In the embodimentsshown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, there is no tray below the modesty panel tohelp support its weight; instead, there are mounting brackets 88 on bothsides of each leg to which the modesty panel is attached with fasteners.It will also be appreciated that for even more support, additionalmounting brackets could be connected to and spaced along the length ofthe lower crossbeam. Regardless of the particular support structuresused to hold the modesty panel in place, as with the other embodimentsof the present invention, the bottom section of the modesty panelextends below the wheel axis for each of the casters.

The pivot assembly 14, which allows the tabletop to rotate between theworking position and the shielding position, is connected to but offsetfrom the upper crossbeam on the front side of the frame. The pivotassembly includes a pivot rod 36 and pivot mount 38 which engagemounting brackets 82 that are connected to the underside of the tabletopwith a set of fasteners 128 as shown in FIG. 2A. In operation, the pivotrod provides an axis 42 of rotation offset from the crossbeam as thepivot rod is spaced a distance 40 from the crossbeam on the front sideof the frame. In the preferred embodiment, the offset distance is equalto approximately one half the length of the support plate, but it willbe appreciated that the offset distance may vary relative to the sizeand weight of the tabletop. The pivot rod can be a continuous rod or mayhave multiple rod sections, such as a pair of rod side sections and arod center section as shown in the drawings. Bearings 126 on ends of thepivot rod preferably provide a smooth and easy action when raising andlowering the top tabletop. As particularly shown in FIG. 4A, thebearings can be located on opposite ends of the rod center section andat the outside ends of the rod side sections adjacent to the legs.Further, although three (3) separate pivot assemblies are used in theembodiment illustrated in the Figures, it should be appreciated that asingle pivot assembly with an elongated rod or additional pivotassemblies may also be used.

The tabletop 16 is a planar body surface 44 having an underside 46 b andtopside 46 a separated by the width 50 of the tabletop and a perimeteredge 48. When assembled, one portion of the tabletop and edge is on thefront side of the frame and another portion and edge is on the rear sideof the frame. In the preferred embodiment the weight of the tabletop isevenly distributed on either side of the lateral crossbeam but sixty(60) percent of the tabletop is rearward of pivot axis. However, it willbe appreciated that other embodiments may have various weightdistributions relative to the size and shape of the tabletop.

Although the preferred tabletop has a rectangular shape with a frontedge 104 a on the front side of the frame, a rear edge 104 b on the rearside of the frame and a pair of side edges longitudinally extendingbetween the ends of the front and rear edge, it will be appreciated thatthe tabletop may have various shapes including but not limited to acircle and an oval. To attach the tabletop to the frame a set ofmounting brackets are connected to the bottom side which operativelyengage the pivot rod of the pivot assembly as described above.Accordingly, the tabletop pivots along with the pivot assembly betweenthe working position 52 and the shielding position 54. As shown in FIGS.2B and 3B, the mounting brackets have a length that is greater than halfthe height of the legs and extend between the front edge and rear edgeof the tabletop to provide further support the tabletop in additionsupport plates.

Standoff posts 98 are attached to the front of each leg and protrudepast the modesty panel to keep the tabletop from over rotating andhitting the modesty panel when moved to the shielding position.Accordingly, the length 100 of the standoff posts is greater than thewidth of the modesty panel and is preferably equal to the distance ofoffset between the pivot rod and crossbeam so that the pivot axis andstandoff posts are within the same plane. A portion of the tabletopmounting brackets attached near the legs of the frame provide a bumpstop when the tabletop is in the shielding position and prevent thestandoff post protruding from the front of the legs from damaging theunderside of the table. Accordingly, the length of the mounting brackets102 on the underside of the table at least extends to the standoff postand is preferably greater than at least half the length of the legs.Other embodiments of the mounting brackets may also include fasteners orbiasing members that assist the lift assist mechanism in holding thetabletop in the shielding position. For example, a magnetic connectioncan be used between the end of the standoff post and the mountingbracket to hold the tabletop in the shielding position.

In addition to the tabletop attached to the upper crossbeam, a modestypanel 18 is connected between the legs of frame as particularly shown inFIGS. 1A and 1B. Like the tabletop, the modesty panel is substantiallyplaner with a front surface 58 a and a rear surface 58 b separated by apanel width 62 and has a perimeter edge 60. As with the tabletopdescribed above, the modesty panel body 56 is preferably rectangularhaving a bottom edge 106 b proximate to the floor, a top edge 106 aseparated a distance (D_(M)) from the bottom edge and a pair of sideends 64 that are proximate and connected to the legs of the frame with aseries of mounting brackets and fasteners described below. However,unlike the tabletop, the modesty panel does not pivot and instead ispermanently affixed between the pair of legs.

The modesty panel is connected to the frame by a set of fasteners 128which extend through mounting brackets 88 on each leg that engage amounting portion near the side edges of the modesty panel, as shown inFIGS. 2B, 3 and 5A. Additionally, in the preferred embodiment the bottomedge of the modesty panel is seated within the tray 90 of the lowercrossbeam which supports the weight of the panel and further ties theframe together to provide additional strength to the table. Preferably,the gap between the bottom edge of the modesty panel and the ground isno more than ¼ inch.

As discussed above, the lower crossbeam is connected to the base of theframe and is offset on the front side of the frame to allow the modestypanel to mount on the front side of the legs as particularly shown inthe FIGS. 1B, 5A and 6. As the longitudinal supports of the base extendforward of the modesty panel, the panel also includes c-channel cutouts130 to allow the base supports to extend through the panel. To ensurethe modesty panel does not have any openings where a projective couldget through, c-channel inserts can be used and inserted into the openportions of the c-channel. Further, although these cutouts are providedfor easier assembly of the table in the preferred embodiment, it will beappreciated that an alternative embodiment may have a solid modestypanel with an aperture through which the longitudinal supports extend.It will also be appreciated that the bracket or other connector 136 thatattaches the lower crossbeam with tray 90 to the longitudinal supportscan fill the entire cutout space from the longitudinal supports to thetray.

In the truss frame design discussed above, the lower crossbeam may notbe included and the modesty panel itself may extended closer to theground wherein the gap between the bottom edge and the ground is no morethan a ¼ inch. In this embodiment the modesty panel is free floatingwithout support on the bottom edge and therefore is only attached to theframe by the series of fasteners along the legs of the frame. To provideadditional support multiple brackets may extend from the truss supportsand additional fasteners can be used to securely attach the modestypanel to the frame. However, it will be appreciated that the preferredembodiment incorporates a lower crossbeam in place of additionalfasteners wherein fasteners, such as screw, necessarily embed into thepanels and potentially create weak points within the panel itself andrender it less effective at stopping projectiles. Accordingly, it ispreferred to limit the amount of fasteners used to connect the tabletopand modesty panel to the frame.

The invention described herein has two general positions, namely aworking position and a shielding position. In the working position thetabletop is substantially horizontal and positioned perpendicular to thevertical legs of the frame where the table functions as standard workstation, such as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. It will also be understoodthat the working position may have an angled tabletop, for example inthe case of a drafting table and that the horizontal orientation ismerely exemplary of the preferred embodiment. When a threat is present,the table can be converted into a ballistic resistant shield wherein thetabletop is pivoted by the pivot assembly into a vertical position thatis substantially parallel to the vertical legs. In the shieldingposition a portion of the tabletop 66 a overlaps 164 a portion of themodesty panel 66 b, as particularly shown in FIGS. 2B and 6, allowingthe table to act as a ballistic resistant shield without any gapsbetween the shielding tabletop and modesty panel.

In operation, the user need only release the locking mechanism 20holding the tabletop in the working position to lift the tabletop intothe shielding position. The preferred locking mechanism is shown inoperation in FIGS. 2A and 5 wherein the locking mechanism is connectedto the underside of the tabletop panel. The locking mechanism is made upof a handle 70 a on the proximal end 68 a positioned proximate to therear edge of the tabletop and a latch 70 b on the distal end 68 bproximate to the crossbeam. When in the locked position 72, shown inFIG. 5A, the locking mechanism engages a catch 96 extending from therear side of the crossbeam at a fixed end to a free end spaces adistance therefrom and prevents the pivot assembly from rotating aboutthe pivot access. Accordingly, the locking mechanism can be unlocked 74by pulling the handle causing the latch to disengage the catch as shownin FIG. 5B. Subsequently the pivot assembly, along with the tabletopconnected thereto, can freely rotate into the shielding position.

Conversely, when the tabletop is rotated back into the working position,the latch is biased back into the locked position and the tabletop isautomatically locked. Although it is preferred that an L-shaped catchextends from the crossbeam to engage the latch, it will be appreciatedthat other locking mechanisms can be used which may engage the crossbeamor another portion of the frame, without a catch. In operation, thelocking mechanism is biased in the locked position where actuating thehandle moves it into the unlocked position and allows the tabletop torotate. In the preferred embodiment, a pair of locking mechanisms arespaced from the centerline of the tabletop, and their handles areconnected by a center bar 132. The bar is situated close to the rearedge of the tabletop, preferably within a distance 134 to the edge thatis less than or equal to the handle's width, so that a person sitting atthe rear of the table could easily reach under and grab hold of the barto actuate the locking mechanisms.

As described herein, the user need only unlock the locking mechanism andlift the tabletop into the shielding position when a threat is present.However, as explained in the background section above, threateningscenarios carry with them increased adrenaline which may cause a user toquickly lift the tabletop causing the entire unit to topple forward andthus rendering the shield useless. Accordingly, another aspect of theballistic resistant table is a lift speed restrictor 22 a having arestriction mechanism 112 which prevents the tabletop from being liftedtoo quickly and thereby ensures the shield will be operational.Additionally, the lift speed restrictor includes a biasing mechanism 110that exerts a force on the tabletop to not only assist a user inpivoting the tabletop into the shielding position but also to hold thetabletop in the shielding position once it is vertical. As shown inFIGS. 5A and 6, a pair of lift speed restrictors have an end 108 aattached the legs of the frame and an opposite end 108 b connected tothe bottom side of the tabletop.

Persons having an ordinary skill in the art will recognize that thepreferred lift speed restrictor is a gas charged lift support 22 bcommonly used in office overhead cabinets, car hoods, and carhatches/tailgates, to create energy by compressing gas inside acylinder. When closed, the energy is stored and subsequently releasedwhen opened. It will also be appreciated that “lift speed restriction”is not the intended purpose of traditional gas lift supports. Instead,the gas lift supports and other types of telescoping pneumatic actuatorsare generally used to bias something in an opened position. Although thegas cylinder is also used to bias the tabletop towards the shieldingposition in the present invention, it also functions as a speedrestrictor wherein the tabletop rotation is slowed by energy within thecylinder as the tabletop is lifted and then subsequently biased in theshielding position after the tabletop is fully rotated. Accordingly, toreturn the tabletop to the working position the user will necessarilyhave to overcome the biasing force.

Other embodiments of a lift speed restrictor may include a spring orcombined electronic actuator and restrictor 22 c, but the preferredembodiment described herein includes a gas lift speed restrictor 22 bwhich may be referred to as a gas spring in the vernacular of thefurniture industry. In embodiments having a spring actuator slowing thelift speed, it will be appreciated that a second locking mechanism ispreferably incorporated to lock the tabletop in the shielding position.Accordingly, a pneumatic gas strut with a chamber section 22 b′ atelescoping rod 22 b″ is preferred where it not only restricts the liftspeed during rotation of the tabletop but also biases the tabletop intothe shielding position without an additional locking mechanism. Further,the gas strut also helps to bias the tabletop remain in the shieldingposition when projectiles hit the front panel and subsequently exert aforce pushing the shield backwards towards the working position. Thebottom side of the tabletop could include a latch that rotates down toengage the top of the modesty panel or standoff posts to assist thebiasing member holding the tabletop in the shielding position andprevent projectiles from pushing over the raised tabletop.

The tabletop according to the preferred embodiment is 30″×60″ and ismade from a ballistic material having a weight of 15.2 lbs/square footfor a 1½″ thick panel. Accordingly, the preferred tabletop weighsapproximately one hundred-ninety (190) pounds and has a weightdistribution of 50% on either side of the lateral crossbeam and 60% ofthe weight on the rear side of the pivot axis. To adequately restrictlift speed during lifting and bias the tabletop forward in the shieldingposition with approximately one hundred fourteen (114) pounds on theside being lifted and seventy-six (76) pounds as a counterbalance on theother side of the pivot axis, the gas strut exerts a force between fifty(50) pounds and twenty-four (24) pounds but preferably exerts a force ofthirty-four (34) pounds. Accordingly, the force exerted by the liftspeed restrictor relative to the weight of portion of the tabletop beinglifted is preferably 3:1 but may vary between 2:1 and 4:1. Further, as atabletop typically has numerous objects thereon, as shown in FIG. 7, thelift assist mechanism must provide sufficient force to overcome theadditional weight of these objects.

For other tabletop arrangements, such as a desk or a council table inwhich the front panel is close to the front edge of the tabletop and theaxis of rotation would be further from persons seated wherein 90% ormore of the weight distribution may be on the rear side of the pivotaxis, an even higher rated lift assist and restrictor may be desired,such as one rated for one hundred fifty (150) pounds. It will also beappreciated that multiple lift speed restrictors and assist devicescould be used, such as with devices on each side of the frame.Additionally, it will be appreciated by those having an ordinary skillin the necessary force exerted by the lift speed restrictor will varyrelative to the size of the tabletop, weight of the tabletop anddistribution of mass. For example, a lighter ballistic material on a30″×60″ will necessarily require less lift speed restriction force thanthat of the preferred embodiment described above.

As lightweight ballistic materials continue to be developed forbuildings, furniture, and other hard-shell structures, such materialscan be incorporated into the present invention and the necessary forceapplied by the lift speed restrictor may vary. Hard-shell armor forprotection from high caliber projectiles had initially been formed frommetals, but it is extremely heavy and can be ineffective. More recenthard-shell armor panels are formed from composite laminate materials,such as ceramics and ceramic composites, and can include a para-aramidbacking such as Kevlar®. Additionally, polyethylene and monolithic basedhard armor plates have been more recently developed and are lighter thanceramic types of hard armor, but these newer materials are also moreexpensive. Hard-shell armor plates can be made from a para-aramid base,such as Kevlar®, which is then coated in a tough thermoplastic resin.

Another aspect of the present invention are ballistic shield indicators114 that notify a person sitting at the table that it can be convertedinto a ballistic resistant shield. In the preferred embodiment at leastone of a color indicator 116 a, a word indicator 116 b and a shapeindicator 116 c are printed on the modesty panel, tabletop and casters(preferably at least the faces and sidewalls of the wheels) so that theindicators are visible in the working position. Preferably, the colorindicator is an orange hue, such as “tangerine tango” (Pantone color17-1463 TCK), which will identify the piece of furniture as ballisticresistant. The color indicator is preferably a vibrant hue, such as neonshades on a color palette.

The furniture preferably includes a specially color-coded latchmechanism, a color-coded rear edge of the tabletop (i.e., the edgefacing the user in a seated position) and top edge of the modesty panelalong with color-coded casters to clearly indicate to a person seated atthe table or standing around the table that the furniture is made withballistic resistant panels rather than having standard structuralpanels. The color-coded rear edge is readily visible by persons seatedat the table with the tabletop in the working position and is alsoreadily visible by persons standing in a room when the tabletop isflipped up into the shielding position. The casters are also readilyvisible when looking at the bottom of the table which can be viewed fromany perspective direction around the table. Accordingly, when severaltables are in a room, with some tables having standard structural panelswhile other tables have the ballistic resistant panels, the colorindicators are helpful to persons in the room to quickly differentiatebetween the different types of tables and identify the tables that offerincreased protection from projectiles.

It will be appreciated that other indicia may be used to identify theprotective tables, such as a series of stripes and/or text that could behelpful to persons with colorblindness or ridges or other projections onthe rear edge that could form braille text for persons who are blind,and the color-coding or other indicia can be used at other locations onthe table surfaces, such as color-coding on the back side of the modestypanel or braille on the tabletop. Visual indicators that serve as theballistic shield identifier, such as a color indicator, a wordindicator, or a shape indicator, are preferably placed on surfaces thathave different orientations from each other and that are at differentheights. For example, when the tabletop is in its horizontalorientation, the rear edge of the tabletop is in a vertical orientationat the top of the leg height while the top edge of the modesty panel isin a horizontal orientation below the top of the leg height. The rearedge of the tabletop is primarily visible from behind the desk whereasthe top edge of the modesty panel and the wheels on the casters can beviewed from different perspective directions around the table. Thecolor-coded latch mechanism which is also at the top of the leg heightcan be viewed from different perspective directions around the tablewhen the viewer is crouched low with eyes below the tabletop whereas thewheels are at ground level and are visible when the viewer is standingup or crouched low. When the tabletop is vertical, the wheels on thecasters can still be viewed from different perspective directions aroundthe table, and the latch mechanism is moved to an upper height above thetop of the legs where it is prominently visible from behind the tableand at the sides of the table.

One or more key-locked safety boxes 26 or drawers can be mounted to theunderside of the table top, directly to the frame or to the backside ofmodesty panel. The safety boxes can hold lifesaving items such as firstaid, mace, firearms, and similar items. Like the table itself, thesafety box can also have indicia to easily identify it as a containinglifesaving items. As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, brackets can be used tomount the safety boxes on opposite sides of the locking mechanisms'center bar. For locking mechanisms that do not have a bar between thelocking mechanisms, a center key-locked drawer can be mounted to theunderside of the tabletop, such as shown in FIG. 7.

One of the benefits of mounting a safety box to the frame or thebackside of the modesty panel is the safety box will not rotate upwardsinto its shielding position with the tabletop so it can be readily beaccessed when the tabletop is horizontal and when it is vertical. Forsafety boxes that are mounted to the underside of the tabletop, thedesign of the safety box may grant access from the side of the boxopposite to the tabletop. This access side would be at the bottom whenthe tabletop is horizontal so it would not be as functional as a safetybox that is mounted to the frame, but when the tabletop is vertical, theaccess side would be facing back to the person(s) behind the shield sothis would provide access when it is most critical. For atabletop-mounted safety box, the access side opposite to the tabletopwould also avoid a delay in rotating the tabletop from the workingposition to the shielding position that might be necessary to permitaccess to a safety box which has an access panel facing the tabletop'sback edge because when the tabletop is vertical, the back edge isrotated up to the top.

The present invention further has an intentionally undersized framerelative to the tabletop and modesty panel so that the outer edges ofthe top and modesty panel can be overlapped with other tables to createa longer, continuous wall of protection. Additionally, it is an aspectof the invention describe herein to allow the tables to be nestedtogether in the shielding position to create a double barrier when athreat is present as well as allow the table sot be easily storedtogether and takin up less space.

As detailed herein, the present invention provides a ballistic shieldthat may protect multiple rows or groupings of people from variousballistic projectiles, such as single or multiple bullets fired fromweapons which generally travel along a vector from the muzzle of thefirearm towards the target. Furthermore, another aspect of the presentinvention is to provide a solid shield without any breaks, slots orapertures between the tabletop and the modesty panel in the shieldingposition to effectively prevent shrapnel and other fragments that areblasted by an explosive device at an irregular vector from passingthrough a space between the tabletop and the modesty panel, therebyfurther protecting from injury the persons or groups of people behindthe ballistic shield. Similarly, the solid shield devoid of gaps andspaces between the tabletop and modesty panel also improves theshielding effect against aggressors who may be continuously moving asthe discharge their weapon.

As shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, the underside of the tabletop proximate toits front edge 66 a contacts the upper section 66 b of the modesty panelsection proximate to its top edge when the tabletop is rotated into theshielding position so that all gaps or spaces between the modesty paneland the tabletop are eliminated in the shielding position. Similarly,the bottom section 144 of the modesty panel extends below thelongitudinal axis 146 of the longitudinal supports to further eliminategaps or spaces between the ground and the bottom edge 106 b of themodest panel. As particularly shown in FIGS. 3-6, 9, and 10, the bottomsection of the modesty panel extends below the wheel axis for each ofthe casters.

In the embodiments shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B, the upper section of themodesty panel and the tabletop section contact one another withoutnecessarily aligning the pivot axis 148 a of the tabletop with the axis148 b of the modesty panel. Instead, the tabletop may pivot pastvertical 150 as shown in FIG. 9A wherein the rear edge of the tabletopis forward of the pivot axis and the front edge of the tabletop isrearward of the pivot axis and in contact with the upper section of themodesty panel. In the preferred embodiment it will be appreciated thatthe tabletop is substantially parallel to the floor in the workingposition and need only rotate to slightly past ninety degrees to movethe rear edge forward of the pivot axis and bring the front edge intocontact with the modest panel. However, where alternative embodimentsmay include tabletops at various angles in the working position, aperson having an ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that theminimum degree of rotation may vary relative to the angle of the tablein the working position, size of the tabletop and modestly panel andposition of the pivot axis.

Rather than rotating the tabletop past vertical as described above, theupper section of the modesty panel and the tabletop section can bebrought into contact with one another to form a single shield face byproviding standoff aprons 154 that respectively abut opposing surfacesof the tabletop and modesty panel as shown in FIG. 9B. In thisalternative embodiment the tabletop rotates into a substantiallyvertical position yet a single shield surface devoid of any gaps andspaces between the modesty panel and tabletop is still created by therespective standoffs. As shown, one protruding apron section 154 a isprovided on the underside front edge of the tabletop and another apron154 b protrudes from the front surface of the modesty panel along thetop edge. Thus, when the tabletop rotates into the shield position, thestandoff aprons respectively abut the front tabletop section 156 a andthe upper modesty panel 156 b of the tabletop to provide a gap freeshield. Although the embodiment in FIG. 9B depicts aprons on both theunderside of the table top and the front side of the modesty panel, itwill also be appreciated that a gap free shield may also be created byproviding a single apron on either the tabletop or modesty panel.

Further still, a solid shield without any breaks, slots or aperturesbetween the tabletop and the modesty panel may be provided by situatingthe pivot axis and the vertical axis of the modesty panel within thesame plane 152 as shown in FIGS. 10A and 10B. Accordingly, when thetabletop is rotated into the shielding position as described herein, thesection of the tabletop along the front edge abuts the top section ofthe modesty panel and a solid shield is formed. As shown in FIG. 10A,aligning the pivot axis and the vertical axis of the modesty panel canbe accomplished by moving the modesty panel towards the front of thelongitudinal supports until it is beneath the pivot axis with a spacer158. Similarly, as shown in FIG. 10B, the same effect can beaccomplished by moving the pivot assembly rearward and/or the legforward until the pivot axis and the modesty panel's vertical axis arealigned in the same plane so that the tabletop's front edge contacts themodesty panel's top section when the tabletop rotates into its shieldingposition.

In another aspect of the inventive flip-top table described herein,telescoping legs 160 may be provided that allow a user to raise andlower the tabletop surface relative to the lower portion of the frame.In FIGS. 8A and 8B, telescoping legs are shown with fasteners 162 thathold the slidable upper section of each leg at a particular heightrelative to the fixed lower section of each leg. The fastener can be abolt or spring-loaded push button that extends between apertures in theupper section and lower section of the legs when they are aligned. Itwill also be appreciated that a manual crank or an electrically poweredactuator can be used to move the upper sections of the legs relative tothe lower sections of the legs, and set screws can be used to adjust andlevel the pitch of the tabletop. As best shown in FIGS. 6, 9 and 10,regardless of the structures used for adjusting the height of thetabletop with the telescoping legs, there is at least some overlapbetween the front section of the tabletop and the top section of themodesty panel when the tabletop is rotated into the shielding positionand the legs are in their most extended orientation. Accordingly,telescoping legs can be integrated within the invention described hereinand still allow for the tabletop and modesty panel to act as aneffective ballistic shield so long as the telescoping range does notraise the front edge of the tabletop above the top edge of the modestypanel when in the shielding position. To maintain the ballisticprotection of the present invention, when the tabletop is rotated intothe shielding position, its front edge extends downward at least as faras top edge of the modesty panel when the telescoping legs are in theirmost extended position.

The embodiments were chosen and described to best explain the principlesof the invention and its practical application to persons who areskilled in the art. As various modifications could be made to theexemplary embodiments, as described above with reference to thecorresponding illustrations, without departing from the scope of theinvention, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoingdescription and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpretedas illustrative rather than limiting. For example, although the presentinvention is disclosed with reference to a flip-top table, it will beappreciated that aspects of the present invention can be incorporatedinto other types of furniture, such as a podium, lectern, or pulpit, acounter at a convenience store, bank, or other place of business wherepersons handling money are vulnerable to attack, or a bar-top. Inparticular, in addition to having a rotating top, a free-standing podiummay have side panels that rotate outward, and although there may not beany need for lift assistance to rotate the side panels outward, the liftspeed restrictor may be important to prevent the podium from topplingover when the sides are swung out. Thus, the breadth and scope of thepresent invention should not be limited by any of the above-describedexemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with thefollowing claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A projectile resistant table, comprising: a framecomprising a first leg, a second leg, and a base, wherein the first legand the second leg each have a proximal end and a distal end, andwherein the base is comprised of a first longitudinal support and asecond longitudinal support connected to the distal ends of first legand the second leg, respectively; a pivot assembly attached to theframe, wherein the pivot assembly rotates about a pivot axis; a tabletopcomprising a tabletop body, a topside, and an underside, wherein thetabletop body comprises a front edge and a rear edge, wherein the pivotassembly is connected to the tabletop body through the underside of thetabletop, wherein the tabletop rotates with the pivot assembly about thepivot axis between a working position and a shielding position, whereinthe tabletop is substantially parallel to the first longitudinal supportand the second longitudinal support in the working position, and whereinthe tabletop is substantially parallel to the first leg and the secondleg in the shielding position; a modesty panel having a panel body, afront surface, a rear surface, a first side, and a second side, whereinthe panel body comprises a top edge and a bottom edge, wherein the panelbody laterally extends between the first side and the second side, andwherein the front edge of the tabletop body overlaps at least a portionof the top edge of the modesty panel body in the shielding position; anda ballistic shield identifier, wherein the ballistic shield identifieris a set of visual indicators provided in a plurality of differentorientations at a plurality of different heights, wherein a first visualindicator has a first orientation at a first height on the tabletop inthe working position, and wherein a second visual indicator has a secondorientation at a second height on the modesty panel that is askew fromthe first orientation and lower than the first height.
 2. The table ofclaim 1, further comprising a lift speed restrictor operativelyconnected between the frame and the tabletop, wherein the lift speedrestrictor limits a lift speed as the tabletop rotates between theworking position and the shielding position.
 3. The table of claim 2,wherein the table is positioned on a floor, wherein a bottom edge of themodesty panel is located proximate to the floor within a thickness ofthe tabletop at least when the tabletop is in the shielding position,wherein the lift speed restrictor further comprises a first restrictorend, a second restrictor end, and a biasing mechanism, wherein the firstrestrictor end is connected to the first leg, wherein the secondrestrictor end is connected to the underside of the tabletop, whereinthe biasing mechanism biases the tabletop towards the shieldingposition, and wherein the biasing mechanism is at least one of apneumatic actuator, a spring actuator, and an electric actuator.
 4. Thetable of claim 1, wherein the first side and the second side of themodesty panel are connected to the first leg and the second leg alongthe rear surface, respectively, wherein a bottom edge of the modestypanel is located below the distal ends of the first leg and the secondleg when the tabletop is in the working position and in the shieldingposition, wherein the pivot axis is positioned forward of a frontsurface of the modesty panel, wherein a rear edge of the tabletoprotates upwards from the working position to the shielding position, andwherein the topside of the tabletop rotates forward of a front side ofthe frame and the front surface of the modesty panel in the shieldingposition.
 5. The table of claim 1, further comprising a lockingmechanism having a locked configuration holding the tabletop in theworking position and an unlocked configuration releasing the tabletop torotate to the shielding position, wherein the working position of thetabletop is substantially horizontal, wherein the shielding position ofthe tabletop is substantially vertical or past vertical, wherein thelocking mechanism is situated below the underside of the tabletop andcomprises a latch, a catch and a handle, and wherein a bottom edge ofthe modesty panel is located below the distal ends of the first leg andthe second leg at least when the tabletop is in the shielding position.6. The table of claim 5, wherein the frame further comprises acrossbeam, wherein the crossbeam connects to and laterally extendsbetween the proximal ends of the first leg and the second leg, whereinthe catch connects to the crossbeam at a fixed end and extends adistance from the crossbeam to a free end, wherein the latch engages thefree end of the catch in the locked configuration when the tabletop isin the working position and prevents the tabletop and the pivot assemblyfrom rotating, wherein the handle is located behind the rear surface ofthe modesty panel between the rear side of the frame and the rear edgeof the tabletop in the working position and operatively engages thelatch, and wherein the latch disengages from the free end of the catchin the unlocked configuration and permits the pivot assembly andtabletop to rotate about the pivot axis to the shielding position. 7.The table of claim 1, wherein the modesty panel further comprises anupper modesty panel section proximate to the top edge and a bottommodesty panel section proximate to the bottom edge, wherein theunderside of the tabletop further comprises a front tabletop sectionproximate to the front edge, wherein the bottom edge of the modestypanel is situated below the first longitudinal support and the secondlongitudinal support at least in the shielding position, and wherein thefront tabletop section is positioned adjacent to the upper modesty panelsection within a thickness of the tabletop in the shielding position. 8.The table of claim 1, further comprising a set of casters mountedproximate to opposite ends of the first longitudinal support and thesecond longitudinal support, wherein each of the casters in the set ofcasters has a wheel axis, and wherein a bottom edge of the modesty panelis situated below the wheel axis for each of the casters.
 9. The tableof claim 8, wherein the set of casters have a third visual indicatorwith a third orientation that is askew from at least one of the firstorientation and the second orientation and a third height that is lowerthan the second height, wherein the first visual indicator is located ona back perimeter edge of the tabletop, wherein the second visualindicator is located on a top perimeter edge of the modesty panel,wherein the ballistic shield identifier is selected from the group ofvisual indicators consisting of a color indicator, a word indicator, ashape indicator, and any combination thereof, wherein the set of casteris further comprised of a set of front casters and a set of rearcasters, wherein the set of front casters is mounted proximate to afront end of each of the first longitudinal support and the secondlongitudinal support, wherein each of the front casters has no casterlocking mechanism, wherein the set of rear casters is mounted proximateto a rear end of each of the first longitudinal support and the secondlongitudinal support, and wherein each of the rear casters has a casterlocking mechanism.
 10. The table of claim 1, further comprising a safetybox positioned below the underside of the tabletop, wherein the safetybox is mounted to at least one of the frame, the tabletop, and themodesty panel, wherein the safety box is located above the bottom edgeof the modesty panel, and wherein the safety box is accessible from arear side of the frame when the tabletop is in the working position andin the shielding position.
 11. A projectile resistant table, comprising:a frame comprising a first leg, a second leg, and a base, wherein thebase is comprised of a first longitudinal support and a secondlongitudinal support connected to the distal ends of first leg and thesecond leg, respectively, and wherein the frame has a front side and arear side; a pivot assembly attached to the frame, wherein the pivotassembly rotates about a pivot axis; a tabletop comprising a tabletopbody, a topside, and an underside, wherein the tabletop body comprises afront edge and a rear edge, wherein the pivot assembly is connected tothe tabletop body through the underside of the tabletop, wherein thetabletop rotates with the pivot assembly about the pivot axis between aworking position and a shielding position, wherein the tabletop issubstantially horizontal in the working position, and wherein thetabletop is substantially vertical or past vertical in the shieldingposition; a modesty panel having a panel body, a front surface, a rearsurface, a first side, and a second side, wherein the panel bodycomprises a top edge and a bottom edge, wherein the panel body laterallyextends between the first side and the second side, and wherein aportion of the front edge of the tabletop body overlaps the top edge ofthe modesty panel body forward of the front surface in the shieldingposition; and a set of casters mounted proximate to opposite ends of thefirst longitudinal support and the second longitudinal support, whereineach of the casters in the set of casters has a wheel axis, and whereina bottom edge of the modesty panel is situated below the wheel axis foreach of the casters at least when the tabletop is in the shieldingposition.
 12. The table of claim 11, further comprising a lift speedrestrictor operatively connected between the frame and the tabletop,wherein the lift speed restrictor limits a lift speed as the tabletoprotates between the working position and the shielding position, whereinthe tabletop has a front edge and a rear edge, wherein a first distancebetween the rear edge and the pivot axis is greater than a seconddistance between the front edge and the pivot axis, and wherein the rearedge rotates upwards and forward of the front side of the frame in theshielding position.
 13. The table of claim 11, wherein the modesty panelfurther comprises an upper modesty panel section proximate to the topedge and a bottom modesty panel section proximate to the bottom edge,wherein the underside of the tabletop further comprises a front tabletopsection proximate to the front edge, and wherein the bottom edge and thebottom modesty panel section are situated below the first longitudinalsupport and the second longitudinal support at least when the tabletopis in the shielding position.
 14. The table of claim 13, furthercomprising a locking mechanism having a locked configuration holding thetabletop in the working position and an unlocked configuration releasingthe tabletop to rotate to the shielding position, wherein the lockingmechanism is situated below the underside of the tabletop and iscomprised of a latch, a catch and a handle, and wherein the fronttabletop section contacts the upper modesty panel section in theshielding position.
 15. The table of claim 11, further comprising aballistic shield identifier, wherein the ballistic shield identifier isa set of visual indicators provided in a plurality of differentorientations at a plurality of different heights, wherein a first visualindicator has a first orientation at a first height on the tabletop inthe working position, wherein a second visual indicator has a secondorientation at a second height on the modesty panel that is askew fromthe first orientation and lower than the first height, wherein theballistic shield identifier is selected from the group of visualindicators consisting of a color indicator, a word indicator, a shapeindicator, and any combination thereof, wherein the frame furthercomprises a crossbeam extending between and connected to the first legand the second leg, wherein the pivot axis is offset a distance from thecrossbeam at the front side of the frame, wherein the first side and thesecond side of the modesty panel are connected to the first leg and thesecond leg along the rear surface, respectively, wherein the catchconnects to the crossbeam at a fixed end and extends a distance from thecrossbeam to a free end, wherein the latch engages the free end of thecatch in the locked configuration when the tabletop is in the workingposition and prevents the tabletop and the pivot assembly from rotating,wherein the handle is located behind the rear surface of the modestypanel between the rear side of the frame and the rear edge of thetabletop in the working position and operatively engages the latch, andwherein the latch disengages from the free end of the catch in theunlocked configuration and permits the pivot assembly and tabletop torotate about the pivot axis to the shielding position.
 16. A projectileresistant table, comprising: a frame comprising a plurality of legs anda base, wherein each of the legs has a proximal end and a distal end,wherein the base is comprised of a first longitudinal support and asecond longitudinal support connected to the distal ends of the legs,wherein each of the legs extends from the proximal end at a height abovethe base to the distal end connected to the base proximate to a floorsurface, and wherein the frame has a front side and a rear side; a pivotassembly attached to the frame, wherein the pivot assembly rotates abouta pivot axis; a tabletop comprising a tabletop body, a topside, and anunderside, wherein the tabletop has a thickness between the topside andthe underside, wherein the pivot assembly is connected to the tabletopbody through the underside of the tabletop, wherein the tabletop rotateswith the pivot assembly about the pivot axis between a working positionand a shielding position, wherein the tabletop is substantiallyhorizontal in the working position, and wherein the tabletop issubstantially vertical in the shielding position; a modesty panel havinga panel body, a first side, and a second side, wherein the panel bodylaterally extends between the first side and the second side, wherein abottom edge of the modesty panel is below the distal end of the legs andis spaced from the floor surface by a distance that is less than thethickness of the tabletop at least when the tabletop is in the shieldingposition, and wherein a portion of the tabletop body overlaps a top edgeof the modesty panel body in the shielding position; and a lockingmechanism having a locked configuration holding the tabletop in theworking position and an unlocked configuration releasing the tabletop torotate to the shielding position, wherein the locking mechanism issituated below the underside of the tabletop and comprises a latch, acatch and a handle.
 17. The table of claim 16, wherein the pivot axis ispositioned forward of a front surface of the modesty panel, wherein arear edge of the tabletop rotates upwards from the working position tothe shielding position, and wherein the topside of the tabletop rotatesforward of the front side of the frame and the front surface of themodesty panel in the shielding position.
 18. The table of claim 16,further comprising a lift speed restrictor operatively connected betweenthe frame and the tabletop, and wherein the lift speed restrictor limitsa lift speed as the tabletop rotates between the working position andthe shielding position.
 19. The table of claim 16, wherein the framefurther comprises a crossbeam, wherein the crossbeam connects to andlaterally extends between the proximal ends of the legs, wherein thefirst side and the second side of the modesty panel are respectivelyconnected to the legs, wherein the catch connects to the crossbeam at afixed end and extends a distance from the crossbeam to a free end,wherein the latch engages the free end of the catch in the lockedconfiguration, wherein the handle is located behind a rear surface ofthe modesty panel between the rear side of the frame and a rear edge ofthe tabletop in the working position and is operatively connected to thelatch, and wherein the latch disengages from the free end of the catchin the unlocked configuration.
 20. The table of claim 16, furthercomprising a set of casters mounted proximate to opposite ends of thefirst longitudinal support and the second longitudinal support, whereineach of the casters in the set of casters has a wheel axis, and whereinthe bottom edge of the modesty panel is situated below the wheel axisfor each of the casters at least when the tabletop is in the shieldingposition.